Comments on: Usable Insight – The Debates: Part 2 – Your Brain on Vitriol http://markgoulston.com/usable-insight-the-debates-your-brain-on-vitriol/ The Website of Dr. Mark Goulston Wed, 08 May 2013 15:15:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: nom domaine http://markgoulston.com/usable-insight-the-debates-your-brain-on-vitriol/comment-page-1/#comment-101430 nom domaine Sun, 14 Oct 2012 03:52:14 +0000 http://markgoulston.com/?p=6951#comment-101430 Attractive part of content. I just stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to claim that I get in fact loved account your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feeds and even I success you get entry to constantly fast. Attractive part of content. I just stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to claim that I get in fact loved account your blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing to your feeds and even I success you get entry to constantly fast.

]]> By: bob burger http://markgoulston.com/usable-insight-the-debates-your-brain-on-vitriol/comment-page-1/#comment-101424 bob burger Sun, 14 Oct 2012 01:54:15 +0000 http://markgoulston.com/?p=6951#comment-101424 very nice very nice

]]> By: David Booth http://markgoulston.com/usable-insight-the-debates-your-brain-on-vitriol/comment-page-1/#comment-100449 David Booth Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:48:40 +0000 http://markgoulston.com/?p=6951#comment-100449 Mark: Love your insights; spot on as usual. Romney and President Obama's challenge is that they are not trained actors and have scant reach into their emotive register. They just don't have the tools to create oxytocin; rather, I feel bile rising during the so-called debates. You are right in that Romney sought to create an amygdala hijack; a cursory fact-checking displays his theory that if you state absolute untruth with authority, you can sell it to many. And Obama went the other way; his lack of emotive tools in speaking left even the faithful uninspired. If their coaches would use tools from performance and neuroscience, we the audience would have a better time watching them, perhaps even cry. And we might cry for something positive, not weep over the fate of our gridlocked, angry country. Mark: Love your insights; spot on as usual. Romney and President Obama’s challenge is that they are not trained actors and have scant reach into their emotive register. They just don’t have the tools to create oxytocin; rather, I feel bile rising during the so-called debates. You are right in that Romney sought to create an amygdala hijack; a cursory fact-checking displays his theory that if you state absolute untruth with authority, you can sell it to many. And Obama went the other way; his lack of emotive tools in speaking left even the faithful uninspired.

If their coaches would use tools from performance and neuroscience, we the audience would have a better time watching them, perhaps even cry. And we might cry for something positive, not weep over the fate of our gridlocked, angry country.

]]> By: Jim Jackson http://markgoulston.com/usable-insight-the-debates-your-brain-on-vitriol/comment-page-1/#comment-100354 Jim Jackson Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:10:46 +0000 http://markgoulston.com/?p=6951#comment-100354 Kathryn Hepburn for president! The theory makes sense. It didn't hurt that you picked three of my stand-out tear jerker scenes. Thanks for your consistent wisdom and sensibility. Jim Kathryn Hepburn for president!

The theory makes sense. It didn’t hurt that you picked three of my stand-out tear jerker scenes. Thanks for your consistent wisdom and sensibility.

Jim

]]>